Mood:  incredulous

The collapse of a $2 billion carbon sequestration project off Western Australia revealed last week tells the story:

WA’s $2b clean coal project ditched 19th May 2008, 9:00 WST
The Federal Government’s silver bullet for dealing with climate change — the underground storage of greenhouse pollution — has been dealt a blow with the collapse in WA of a $2 billion trial of the technology.

The clean coal experiment run by the resources giants Rio Tinto and BP was ditched after it was found that deep-sea storage beds off Perth would not hold the tonnes of carbon dioxide the companies wanted to bury.

And notice this from 19 May too [bold added]:

Subject: [Greens-Media] Carbon storage liability issues will destroy 'cleancoal' pipedream even faster than technology failures

Hobart, Monday 19 May 2008  Australian Greens climate change
spokesperson, Senator Christine Milne, today called Martin Ferguson's
draft legislation for carbon storage a clear demonstration of the many
problems still bedevilling the proposed technology.

Senator Milne said, "This draft legislation perfectly demonstrates the
Pandora's box of liability issues facing carbon capture and storage that
can never be satisfactorily resolved.

"Aside from the tremendous remaining questions about whether the
technology will even work, the liability issue may ensure that so-called
'clean coal' projects never get off the ground. Coal corporations will
not commit to storing tens of millions of tonnes of CO2 unless they are
guaranteed that the governments will carry their liability in
perpetuity, and no one government can bind future governments to ensure
that will be the case.

"You would have thought that, after Ok Tedi and so many other examples
in recent years, no government would readily facilitate companies
walking away from their long-term pollution liabilities. But this draft
legislation, released deliberately on a Saturday to avoid scrutiny,
appears to do exactly that by passing perpetual liability for carbon
leakage into public hands if the Minister issues a site closing
certificate.

"It is wrong to transfer the risk of worse climate change from carbon
leakage onto taxpayers and future generations. Working families care
about the world their children inherit and the costs that are imposed
upon them.

"The minister and industry are on notice that future governments will
not bound by this one. A future minister might care about the atmosphere
more than the coal industry and simply refuse to sign closing
certificates, ensuring that corporations continue to carry the
liability.

"I fully expect the coal corporations to launch a huge lobbying effort
to amend the draft to require the minister to issue a closing
certificate once certain conditions have been met. That has, after all,
long been the tactic of the nuclear industry around the world.

"The liability issues clearly demonstrate the folly of further
developing an industry which generates an enormous and highly dangerous
waste stream. Rather than spending billions on working out how to store
the waste and billions more on perpetual monitoring, surely it would be
better not to generate the waste at all and move to truly clean
alternatives.

"A myriad of renewable energy technologies provide that alternative and
are ready to do the job now. Every dollar we spend on coal is a missed
opportunity which will further undermine Australia's competitive
advantage. Ministers Ferguson, Wong and Garrett are desperately trying
to perpetuate the coal age when the solar century has already started.

"Martin Ferguson revealed the government's true priorities, in saying
that making geosequestration work is vital to the long term
sustainability of the coal industry. The Government should fund
technologies that promote the long term sustainability of the planet,
not the coal industry."

 And this referencing Greenpeace:

Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 2:51 PM

Subject: [Greens-Media] Greenpeace carbon capture report exposes 'falsehope' of govt and industry

Greenpeace carbon capture report exposes 'false hope' of govt and
industry

Hobart, Monday 5 May 2008  Australian Greens climate change
spokesperson, Senator Christine Milne, today welcomed Greenpeace
International's comprehensive report into carbon capture and storage,
and said that the report confirms our view that we must act now to
reduce emissions fast with the renewable energy and efficiency
technologies which do exist.

Senator Milne said "We cannot further delay action on climate change, or
continue to divert valuable budget dollars, because a hypothetical
alternative future solution might allow us to keep using coal.

"The urgency of climate change is such that we must act now to reduce
emissions fast, using the technologies that are ready and available now,
such as energy efficiency, solar thermal, wind and many others.

"Prime Minister Rudd must now jettison any plans to spend public dollars
on coal company research which is increasingly exposed as a sham. The
coal companies can spend their own money on whatever they like, but
leaders on climate change should focus on reducing emissions now.

"Today's report from Greenpeace sets out clearly and with detailed
references all the key problems with carbon capture and storage from
coal, showing that it is far from the reality that its advocates claim,
that there are very real risks of leakage, particularly given the scale
of storage that would be needed, and that it would negate the cost
advantage that coal currently claims.

"The analysis presented in this report is far from unique and cannot be
taken as simply the view of environmentalists. More and more industry
representatives are expressing concern that carbon capture and storage
technologies are not living up to the hopes of recent years, and the
techno-fix for coal is slipping further into the future and higher up
the cost ladder.

"The pipe-dream of 'clean coal' is already being outcompeted by
renewables around the world, even though the playing field is skewed
heavily in its favour through subsidies and the benefits of existing
coal infrastructure. Despite years of effort, progress is simply not
being made in demonstrating that it is viable, let alone competitive.

"If we made the decision now to prioritise cutting emissions and
invested in the technologies which can do so now, renewables and
efficiency would do the job and coal with carbon capture would be
obsolete before it was even ready to come online."

The Greenpeace report, false Hope: Why carbon capture and storage won't
save the climate, is available for download at www.greenpeace.org/ccs

It's timely to repeat our report from 4 April 2008 (as below) given the front page story in The Australian today. Friday, 4 April 2008

Energy Minister Ferguson gambling on safety of CO2 carbon capture after Norway report?
Mood:  blue
Topic: globalWarming

We were intrigued by crikey.com.au item 12 yesterday relating to an area called Nirranda close to where we grew up in Warrnambool , SW Victoria:

This story at crikey.com.au set set us on a flurry of web based research

http://www.crikey.com.au/Politics/20080403-Tall-tales-from-the-carbon-crypt.html?display=thankyou#comments

Tall tales from the carbon crypt

Thursday, 3 April 2008

Ben Sandilands writes:

Federal Energy Minister Martin Ferguson and his Victorian peer Peter Batchelor seemed oblivious yesterday to their brush with geological time.

They pretended to open the valve on a pipeline which is as of this morning sending 100,000 tonnes of dense CO2 into a carbon crypt under farmlands east of Warrnambool where it will remain trapped beneath a layer of impervious rock for as long as Australia is recognisable as a continent.

For tens of millions of years. But maybe not.

There are quirky things about carbon sequestration, which is seen as a key to clean coal technologies, that seem to have escaped notice on a momentous occasion that makes more usual political photo opportunities like bridge openings seem ephemeral in comparison.

The wind storm that wrecked parts of SE Australia actually broke the power supply to the pumps that force the supercritical or fluid-like mass of CO2 into its prison, but the photo opportunity proceeded.

The sequestration demonstration is important for the coal and oil lobbies, and very annoying for some environmentalists, because if it works, it could underpin processes that could eliminate most of the man made greenhouse gas emissions that are derived from fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas.

But this is where the recent comments of Professor Will Steffen at the ANU put the risks and possible rewards of carbon crypts in sharp focus. Steffen says mankind is creating a new geological epoch which might be called the Anthropocene because of the mass extinctions of species of plants and animals associated with the acceleration of human impacts on the planet.

In a his co-authored paper Steffen says carbon sequestration would not only mitigate global warming but reduce the acidification of the oceans caused by their being overwhelmed by dissolved carbon which other researchers say is damaging the marine food chain.

But Steffen and his colleagues also point to the possibility than in the deep future, tens of thousands of years from now, a world that has long mastered clean energy may be confronted by the cyclical onset of the next ice age.

Our distant descendants might well, they suggest, liberate the sequestered carbon to quickly warm the atmosphere and thwart the serious consequences for agriculture, and civilisations, of a planet that turns very cold as the seas retreat and the ice caps advance.

All of which raises the thought that the wind-swept site of the southern Otway carbon crypt could be visited in a far distant time by tomb raiders trying to save themselves from global cooling not warming.

Until or beyond it is forced by geological forces into which will put 100,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide.

Send your tips to boss@crikey.com.au, submit them anonymously here or SMS tips and photos to 0427 TIP OFF.

An amusing smart alecy story and hope they don't mind repeating it in full here. Only there are life and death issues at hand if our research has any weight since last night. We posted most of it on their website comments section.

Here is the local rose tinted Warrnambool Standard report of yesterday 3rd April 08:

Carbon plant leads the way 

9:52AM | A REVOLUTIONARY technique to combat climate change is happening in a Nirranda paddock. [more]

The federal govt website references an IPCC report of Sept 2005 - which given the fast changing area of science and interest is like the stone age really and totally outdated surely? See the quote in bold near the bottom of this page from that IPCC special report, resolving very little in terms of danger: At

http://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/industry/ccs/index.html

listing such as these documents.

• Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage - Fact sheet
• Carbon Capture and Storage - Report to the Australian Greenhouse Office on Property Rights and Associated Liability Issues
• IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (Sept 2005)

This last authoritative IPCC report states:

""Summary for policy makers" at p12-14 - "A sudden and large release of CO2 would pose immediate dangers to human life and health, if there were exposure to concentrations of CO2 greater than 7–10% by volume in air. ...High fluxes in conjunction with stable atmospheric conditions could lead to local high CO2 concentrations in the air that could harm animals or people. Pressure build-up caused by CO2 injection could trigger small seismic events. While there is limited experience with geological storage, closely related industrial experience and scientific knowledge could serve as a basis for appropriate risk management, including remediation. The effectiveness of the available risk management methods still needs to be demonstrated for use with CO2 storage." [bold added]

More searching led us to the Norway Petroleum Safety Authority report for 2007-08:

http://www.ptil.no/NR/rdonlyres/0A5F69C6-097D-4B6C-9898-38B4628A1A0B/16828/SAFETY20079.pdf

Quite worrying actually. And then this semi retraction at

 http://www.ptil.no/English/Helse+miljo+og+sikkerhet/HMS-aktuelt/8_coto_budskap_.htm  

which has all the hallmarks of Big Govt and Industry leaning on the safety cop on the beat in Norway to turn a blind eye:

This is not some theoretical issue: Check this commentary on Daily Kos way back in November 2006:

In 1986, at a place called Lake Nyos in Cameroon, 1800 people and 3500 animals were killed in a matter of minutes when the lake suddenly, for reasons still not entirely understood, released 1.6 million tons of stored carbon dioxide.   The death toll wasn’t greater because the area was sparsely populated.   BP plans to sequester 4 million tons a year, meaning that in just 4 years of operations they will put 10 times as much carbon dioxide beneath Carson, California as was released at Nyos.   In contrast to the rural communities around Nyos, Carson, California – where I lived for about 6 months back in the 1970’s – has 90,000 people.   The adjacent community of Torrance has 120,000 and Lomita has 20,000.   Moreover the area is crisscrossed by important earthquake faults, including the Crenshaw fault that runs almost directly down the center Crenshaw Blvd where there are lots of refineries.   Further, the entire area, including many parking lots of commercial facilities is chock full of oil wells, many of which I would imagine stopped functioning long ago, and many of which are probably forgotten.

Draw your own inferences.

Notice this report also:

"Cost, safety fears threaten climate change remedy", 18 Sep 2007 - Reuters

with this quote:

"SAFETY Legal barriers are another brake on actual burial of CO2 in Europe. Later this year Brussels will propose tweaks to existing water and waste rules, with 2010 slated as the earliest likely date for those changes to come into force. "Industry might feel it's a gamble, they're going to have a nagging doubt until the law's in place," said the EC's Taylor. And then there are safety fears. In sufficient quantities CO2 suffocates people, simply by crowding out an adequate supply of oxygen. A small worry is that if it escaped from underground or from a pipeline, the heavy, odourless gas may collect in a deep valley pocket, for example. "People could walk into this cloud of CO2, not realise it, and be asphyxiated by it," said Julia Race, an expert in pipeline engineering at Britain's Newcastle University. "A number of issues, technical and others, urgently need addressing," she said.

The local Green Party were all over this U turn away from the carbon geological sequestration technology by the W Bush regime earlier this year too:

Collapse of US clean coal facility another blow to NSW privatisation
 
Media Release: 5 February 2008
 
The decision by the US government to abandon the FutureGen carbon capture and storage project undermines yet another argument for privatisation of the NSW electricity industry, according to Greens NSW MP John Kaye.
 
Dr Kaye said: "A major component of NSW Treasurer Costa's $15 billion privatisation was a massive private sector investment in carbon reduction technologies, which is increasingly looking like the impossible dream.
 
"The Iemma government justifies the environmental risks of long term leasing of the state-owned generators and the sale of the retailers by arguing that it would encourage investment in clean coal technologies to reduce carbon emissions.
 
"The collapse of the world's largest clean coal project makes a mockery of Treasurer Costa's attempted green washing of privatisation.
 
"The Iemma government's sell-off scheme relied on ensuring that the private sector would invest between $3 to $4 billion in retrofitting the state's existing power stations with carbon capture and storage and would pony up the additional money to build new base load generation with low carbon technologies.
 
"The Bush administration has just delivered a body blow to carbon capture and storage.
 
"By pulling their $2 billion investment out of the FutureGen project in Illinois, the US administration has delivered a massive vote of no confidence in clean coal and consequently in Michael Costa's electricity privatisation deal.
 
"The electricity industry in NSW is responsible for 57 million tonnes of CO2 each year.
 
"It makes no sense to hand over 35% of the state's greenhouse gas emissions to private owners when carbon reduction technologies are increasingly looking farcical," Dr Kaye said.
 

For more information: John Kaye 0407 195 455

  

    State Energy Minister Peter Batchelor (left), his federal counterpart Martin Ferguson and CO2CRC chief executive Peter Cooke at yesterday's carbon plant launch.080402JL02 Picture: JARED LYNCH

.......................

Postscript #1

We notice this press release from Senator Milne (Greens):

Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:10 AM

Otways carbon storage pointless PR, bad Budget decision

Hobart, Wednesday 2 April 2008  Australian Greens climate change
spokesperson, Senator Christine Milne, today called on the Rudd
Government to stop paying polluters by subsidising projects such as the
Otways carbon storage project being opened today.

Senator Milne said "The Otways project is yet another attempt to
demonstrate the safety of carbon storage while bypassing the really
difficult aspect of proving that carbon can be effectively and
affordably captured at coal fired power stations.

"The storage of CO2 stripped from natural gas that will be done at the
Otways is tiny in comparison to similar projects that are already being
done overseas and will add little to our understanding of whether carbon
can indeed be stored permanently and nothing to our understanding of
whether significant carbon capture is possible.

"Years after being first proposed as Australia's carbon solution, there
has still been no pilot plant demonstration of capture technology. Like
cold fusion and 'Generation 4' nuclear power, carbon capture is always
just over the horizon, while renewable energy technologies move ahead in
leaps and bounds, even without the tremendous government support.

 "The leader of the Otways project, Peter Cook, has admitted that this
technology will always be too expensive to retrofit onto existing old
power stations and new infrastructure will need to be built. If that is
the case, surely we should leapfrog straight into the renewable energy
technologies which don't create pollution in the first place.
 
"The Otways project is government-funded PR for the coal sector and
would be a perfect place to start for a government looking to find
Budget cuts.

"Instead of paying polluters to keep being able to justify their
existence, the Government should use its first Budget to shift funding
away from coal, oil and roads across to renewable energy, energy
efficiency and public transport."

Ferguson out of line on coal, uranium

Martin Ferguson, Minister for Resources and Energy, is undermining any
credibility the Rudd Government has on climate change, Senator Milne
warned, and must be pulled into line.

Senator Milne said, "While the Prime Ministerial cat is away, the mice
will play, and Martin Ferguson is taking the opportunity to raise his
environmentally destructive flag once again.

"Martin Ferguson's vision that we can run our car fleet on liquidised
coal is undoubtedly playing a key role in his proud support of the
Otways project. He is fast-tracking funding to this horrendously
polluting transport fuel while his Rudd Government colleagues talk up
their commitment to climate action.

"Ferguson has also taken the opportunity of Prime Minister Rudd's
overseas trip to resurrect the Howard Government's Uranium Industry
Framework, pushing the boundaries on an issue that has already
threatened to split the ALP. Mr Rudd must pull him into line."

Contact: Tim Hollo on 0437 587 562

Notes:

* The Otways project will attempt to store some 100,000 tonnes of
CO2 stripped from natural gas over the course of 18 months.
* In comparison, a similar project in Algeria being undertaken by
BP is storing around 1,000,000 tonnes each year.
* The other major storage projects, Sleipner and Snohvit in
Norway, also involve storing CO2 stripped from natural gas.
* There is no project anywhere in the world storing CO2 stripped
from coal at power stations.

* The dreams of effective geosequestration were dealt a
significant blow earlier this year when plans for the world's first
integrated carbon capture and storage project, FutureGen in the USA,
were put on hold due to being well over budget and behind schedule. The
Australian Government had invested in FutureGen.
* The ZeroGen project in Queensland, Australia's pin up for
demonstrating carbon capture, is still several years from commissioning.

* There are a raft of major issues with liability for potential
leakage that are yet to be worked through. With an issue that will
require permanent storage, will companies or governments bear the
long-term liability?

* Even at best estimates, geosequestration could only capture
70-90% of emissions from coal fired power stations.
* This means that geosequestration cannot provide a long-term
solution for the complete decarbonisation that is necessary in the
coming decades. It can only provide a very expensive and risky
short-term option.


Tim Hollo
Media and Communications Adviser
Senator Christine Milne
+61 (0)2 6277 3063
+61 (0) 437 587 562
www.christinemilne.org.au

Posted by editor at 12:02 PM NZT

Updated: Friday, 23 May 2008 12:57 PM NZT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  accident prone

Today the Big Media have indeed gone big exposing a controversial art show:  Apparently the Sydney Morning Herald ran a smallish report yesterday in the wake of Ork's demise noting the photographic exihibition featured some naked adolescents. But today it's a really big front page Daily Telegraph story as well, day time tv, radio, the works.

It all reminds us of Clive Hamilton's crusade against sexualised children in retail advertising, leading to legal threats against him for inflammatory accusations. The legal threats have been withdrawn recently.

By incredible coincidence the usually (but not always) family friendly SBS Inspector Rex ran a drama script just last night about the tough subject of child kidnap and porn. The script writers did it very well and understated too getting the social problem across to the viewers with a child actor similar to the infamous UK Maddie kidnaping and probably murder which hit the global media. (To be honest we switched over for a while realising what a grim subject matter it was, too stressful.) The show had a happy ending appropriate to an 8-8.30pm time slot.

So what is innocent artistic representation as distinct from exploitation/predatory? We leave that to others to battle over at least for now.

What we want to comment about is the perfect storm of surrounding political context:

- Ork the ex MP's conviction and sentencing yesterday on the heinous charge of child sex/predation, former NSW Aboriginal Affairs Minister

- Linda Burney MP, as acting NSW Arts Minister (?) accused of travel rorts to Cannes, former Aboriginal Affairs bureaucrat and pollie now in seat of Canterbury close ally of Iemma in neighbouring seat

- sectors of Aboriginal society have the scourge of child molestation as a high profile tough problem to deal with in remote or isolated communities in a cycle of poverty.

- the mature audience for Bill Henson's photo show in East Sydney involving naked adolescent images tends to include so called (at least as a stereotype) 'Labor Luvvie' segment of the arts crowd which Burney/Sartor etc guard jealously as a constituency

- this arts constituency are largely gathered right now at the Sydney Writers Festival not so far away in The Rocks/Millers Point venue, and will be all a twitter about high level conceptual debates over what is art.

- indeed the ABC are running features about great and good writers from the writers festival, not least the tv news 2 nights back on The Ernies book sledging various public and media figures over sexism to women. This is an agenda likely to court revenge tactics in the big media. (We couldn't resist publishing about the Ernies' authors' mixed record on other matters of public/political morals.)

- As if to tempt fate, or rather bait ALP sympathetic 'arty farty' crowd at the Writer's Festival (eg Yvette Andrews/Meredith Burgmann authors of the The Ernies, Bob Carr and Maxine McKew tomorrow), the Daily Telegraph then ran a story front page about an entertainer accused of slutty behaviour entertaining the troops (as Bob Hope really did do with very different spin because he was a man?). Apparently it's all a right wing defence fantasy about the shapely woman who denies the trash talk completely. Didn't happen. Too much sun on the soldier boys perhaps.

Which all brings us back to the attack on arty nakedness albeit in highly expert techniques at the Bill Henson show. The technical expertise is no resolution of the moral controversy (eg recall Leni Riefenstahl's NAZI awesome propaganda films were quite morally bankrupt). Immense craft and talent is not a moral free pass.

It's not just about art folks. It's about right and wrong, and political context. All these threads twist and combine in a multi-faceted tsunami of big media interest likely to saturate the next several media cycles.And maybe that's just bad luck for those involved.

PM Rudd has bought into the issue too already in the last hour on daytime tv. Looking very much like a leader getting ahead of the curve ball. Bring on the sunshine and fresh air. A culture of openness and not just over child protection issues, for all politics (eg FoI) would be good.

Posted by editor at 10:34 AM NZT

Updated: Friday, 23 May 2008 9:46 PM NZT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  sharp

We were instructed as a public interest lawyer last week by Jane Azzopardi, a local land holder at Mangrove Mountain, regarding what she regards as irregularities in decision making over Coca Cola bottling plant.

By a genuine coincidence Ian Cohen MP (Green Party) has issued this today, and notwithstanding the technical glitch by way of correction, Coca Cola have some big questions to answer (see further below):

Media Release from Ian Cohen MLC                                      
                                        21st May 2008
 
CORRECTION:
 
NSW Government joins in Coca Cola greenwash
 
Please note the corrections in paragraph 2 of this release. Coca Cola
Amatil are drawing on the aquifer at Mangrove Mountain, however the
company state that the percentage of the resource they are directly
responsible for extracting is 1 – 2% of the total water allocation.
Please note also that Coca Cola’s bottling ratio for water production
is 1.3 litres of water to make 1 finished litre of bottled water. Our
initial release claimed incorrectly that Coca Cola use 2.4 litres in the
bottling process to produce 1 litre of water. The 2.4 litre figure cited
in our original release refers to an analysis of the consumption of
bottled water over the product’s life, conducted by National Campaign
Coordinator for the Boomerang Alliance, Dave West. This figure refers to
water consumed in the packaging, production and disposal of the
product.
 
The Minister for Emergency Services and Water - Nathan Rees – has
taken time out of his schedule to visit Coca Cola - a major donor - and
present them with a 5-star rating for water management.
 
“It’s quite ironic that Coca Cola have been given recognition for
water efficiency at one of their plants in Sydney yesterday. An analysis
of the consumption of bottled water over the product’s life, reveals
that at least 2.4 litres of water is used for every litre of bottled
water consumed,” said Upper House Greens MP Ian Cohen. 

 “The Department of Environment and Climate Change – of which Nathan
Rees was temporarily the Minister for – banned bottled water use
within their department at the end of last year citing the environmental
costs of production, transportation, refrigeration and disposal.
 
“DECC calculated that about 200ml of oil is used to produce each
litre bottle of water, including in the plastic, transportation and
refrigeration. More than 60,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions enter
the atmosphere each year from the consumption of 250 million litres of
bottled water in Australia – equivalent to the emissions from 13,000
cars.
 
“Clean Up Australia claim that 2.7 million tonnes of plastic are used
to bottle water around the world annually and that Australians buy
118,000 tonnes of plastic drink bottles a year but only recycle 35 per
cent of them. Thanks in part to Coca Cola’s ongoing opposition to
Container Deposit Legislation, the remaining 76,700 tonnes either goes
to landfill or ends up as litter.
 
“Dave West from the Boomerang Alliance says that drinking tap water
instead of bottled for just one year, will produce 75% less waste,
consume 85% less energy and will reduce water consumption by 58%.
 
Ian Cohen recently called for a moratorium on all political donations
from beverage companies, particularly whilst a national review of the
viability of a container deposit scheme is underway. Coca Cola have
donated over $900,000 to the ALP over the last nine years.
 
“Voluntary waste management schemes have consistently failed to
achieve targets for recycling and resource recovery. It’s time for
container deposit legislation,” said Mr Cohen.
 
Further Information: Ian Cohen: 0409 989 466 or Nic Clyde on 0417 742 754

Minister Nathan Rees, NSW Government

...................

Our instructions are that Gosford Council are contesting giant corporation Coca Cola's right to permanent approval of 66 Megalitres of water a year on the basis that the company has not undertaken a court ordered 2 year trial by Commissioner Tim Moore, at that level of extraction intensity. CC have instead only extracted 37 Megalitres (on average) which sort of defeats the purpose of the trial base line data and monitoring plan of the Land & Environment Court.

As we understand it CC and Gosford Council have already drafted development consent conditions for the full 66 Megalitre water extraction without having really done the trial set out by the court.

That's a bit sly to our ear. It's suggestive CC don't want a real trial at full extraction rates because they know they will never get full approval at that rate with true baseline data for that intensity. Indeed we are told by a local that after 2 months of pumping at a rate of some 66 Megalitres the water table plummeted below the 7 metre cap to 10 metres hence the company backed off, but now it's game on.

We have learned that Peter Campbell a semi retired local business man and critic of Coca Cola and the process in Gosford Council planning section side stepping the Court regime has spoken on 2GB Sydney radio yesterday for about 15 minutes about this state of affairs as a member of Mangrove Mountain District Community Group. 

Especially the perceived inconsistency of Minister Rees's green friendly endorsement of CC in light of the concerns over an insufficient trial potentially impacting the livelihood of other agricultural business people in the Mangrove Mountain area.

What on earth is actually going on here Sally? Exploiting the temporary upswing in coastal rainfall before La Nino drought conditions bites again to avoid strict conditions from the Land & Environment Court? Say it isn't so Sally.

Loane ... Coke's new spin doctor in chief.
Photo: Fiona-Lee Quimby

Recent media on related topics here:

7.30 Report - 19/09/2005: Stoush brewing over spring water

23-24.2.08 Message on a bottle labelled as greenwash - Environment - smh.com.au

23.2.08 Return to sender, or many unhappy returns? Sydney Morning Herald

24.4.07 Disaster in a bottle - Environment - smh.com.au

18.4.08 www.smh.com.au - Bottle refund inquiry but no plastic bag deal

23.4.08 Everest of containers must stop, Cr Ingrid Strewe Mayor of Waverley in Wentworth Courier  p36

22.3.08 Hard to swallow misleading criticism of bottled water industry ... Letters , SMH

25.3.08 Bottled water: the new social poison? Julian Lee, Marketing Reporter, p1 Sydney Morning Herald

19.8.07 The real cost of bottled water - National - theage.com.au By Jason Koutsoukis

23 Feb 2008 Water way to earn the big bucks, 2 page feature Sydney Daily Telegraph

Posted by editor at 5:15 PM NZT

Updated: Thursday, 22 May 2008 11:39 AM NZT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  don't ask

The Big Media are as the tag implies going big on a protest against kangaroo culling in Canberra. We lived there 1983 - 1990 including lots of bushwalking in the relevant area. It's mostly a set up drawing the animal protection lobby into action and anxiety and then dumping on them as per this set of articles:

20 May 08 p1 picture story 'Little joey stuck in middle of slaughter'

20 May 08 A dead roo or two - who cares? | The Daily Telegraph

We don't want to say much about the heartfelt protests of animals rights and/or welfare people in Canberra. It's their argument for their local politics to resolve. Even if it is federal owned land run by a national organisation.

Why is it only a local issue you say? Because some 3 to 5 million kangaroos are 'culled' every year by the kangaroo pet food and skins industry, variable depending on drought conditions. Endorsed by every govt of both major parties state and federal. In other words the biggest wildlife slaughter on the planet is hardly affected either way by what happens in Canberra's suburban bush:

The 2005 Commercial Kangaroo harvest quota

In December 2004, the Australian Minister for Environment and Heritage, Senator Ian Campbell, approved commercial kangaroo harvesting quotas for 2005 totalling around 3.9 million. This is a decrease of 0.5 million animals from the quota approved in 2004. This decrease in quota is related to the drop in kangaroo populations associated with widespread drought in eastern Australia over recent years.

The 2005 quota represents about 16 per cent (between 14 per cent and 20 per cent) of estimated populations of the four kangaroo species that are commercially harvested. The scientific community and State management agencies consider that annual harvest levels in the order of 15 per cent of the populations for Grey kangaroos and Wallaroos, and 20 per cent of Red kangaroo populations are sustainable.

Eastern Australia has undergone severe drought in recent years and, because the primary driver of kangaroo populations is rainfall, kangaroo numbers in eastern Australia have declined as a result. Populations of some species in NSW and QLD have declined by nearly 30% per cent between the 2003 and 2004 surveys, Populations of other species in NSW and QLD and all species in South Australia have increased (between 1% and 33%). In Western Australia populations of Red kangaroos have declined slightly, while Western Grey kangaroos have increased.

 

We have written about this before with some very serious concerns about health in a less controlled wild compared to agri meat production system, and also genetic impact on targeting of alpha males. We understand for instance that the legendary Big Red Kangaroo is practically non existent, with critters barely a few years old ever surviving until the inevitable bullet:

 Friday, 18 May 2007 The tricky kangaroo meat debate - next course
Mood:  incredulous
Topic: health

Monday, 14 May 2007

Lethal hydatid in kangaroo offal/meat via dog vector is a real worry to us, but not for industry group
Mood:  blue
Topic: ecology

 

This level and pattern of shooting has got to be bad for the genetic health of species until the inevitable climate, disease or other impact threatens a whole population. That's our evolutionary ecology degree coming through.

And here is another ecological aspect. If there is a local overpopulation problem from the kangaroos say from artificial water sources and lack of natural predators then a solution which might set a few people back on their heels is ... reintroduce natural predators. There are some major public safety implications of wild dingos in Canberra, but as this ABC documentary makes very clear with fascinating insight

Strange Days On Planet Earth - Predators, 8:35pm Tuesday, 15 Jan 2008 

with wolves and deer in Yellowstone National Park, general ecological health depends on the presence of top order predators. Nature is full of pain and death like that. All power to the vegetarians amongst us reducing greenhous impacts in their diet, but it remains the case nature is not vegetarian.

Posted by editor at 4:02 PM NZT

Updated: Wednesday, 21 May 2008 4:38 PM NZT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  a-ok

It's not that Brendan Nelson as Opposition Leader is not doing his best, it simply appears Turnbull is better.

Albrechtsen in the The Australian lends her voice from the loyal Liberal side to a change. This speech to a packed audience will only add to the feeling. Smart high achieving wife Lucy Turnbull is there, and the high level press are set to thinking. The Q&A section will be pretty hot.

And we notice Turnbull has no problem with reading where needed to give a long speech. Pretty normal that. It shows real preparation like PM Rudd.

Meanwhile over at Planet ALP local press carries the amusing graphic of Minister Albanese with infrastructure 'toy box' while everyone knows this is no game, with $5 billion truck tunnels and cancer causing ventilation stacks (a message Treasurer Wayne Swan as a survivor surely understands) slated for AA's own seat of Grayndler:

1 May 2007 $5b secret road under Sydney | The Daily Telegraph

Posted by editor at 2:50 PM NZT

Updated: Wednesday, 21 May 2008 6:46 PM NZT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  rushed

Green Party MP Dr John Kaye MLC, 2 days ago:

Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:11 AM

Subject: [Greens-Media] Coalition will sacrifice credibility if it backsIemma's power sell-off

Coalition will sacrifice credibility if it backs Iemma's power sell-off
 
Media Release: 19 May 2008
 
NSW Opposition Leader Barry O'Farrell and Nationals Leader Andrew Stoner would be unable to enforce their five electricity sell-off pre-conditions if they vote for Premier Iemma's legislation, according to Greens NSW MP John Kaye.
 
Commenting on the story on page 2 of today's Sydney Morning Herald, Dr Kaye said: "Coalition support for privatisation could only be on a wing and a promise.
 
"The government's Electricity Industry Restructuring Bill creates broad ranging powers for Treasurer Michael Costa to privatise the state's retailers and the generators in any way he sees fit, without further reference to parliament.
 
"The legislation ignores four of the five Coalition pre-conditions.
 
"It would be very difficult, if not impossible, to amend the Bill to include independent oversight of the sale process by the auditor-general or a parliamentary committee or the adoption of a Rural Communities Impact statement.
 
"Support for the Iemma government's legislation would then be based on a promise from Treasurer that he would implement the Coalition's conditions.
 
"For months Mr O'Farrell maintained the Coalition would 'wait to see the detail' before promising to back the changes to electricity industry ownership.
 
"Now that the Electricity Industry Restructuring Bill is available on the government's web site, it is clear that the Iemma government has no intention of releasing the details of how the industry will be restructured and sold-off.
 
"It would be a massive back down for the Liberals and Nationals to vote for legislation that allows the Treasurer to choose the final structure of the industry, the nature of the sale or lease and the maximum ownership level any one individual can hold.
 
"He can even override provisions of the Trade Practices Act relating to electricity trading contracts.
 
"The Coalition's credibility is on the line. If they hand over control of the electricity industry to Treasurer Costa, their promise to scrutinise the sell-off will prove to have been nothing but political posturing to placate unhappy rural MPs," Dr Kaye said.
 
For more information: John Kaye 0407 *** ***

.....................................

Now we hear via ABC radio this morning 21 May 2008, that both the Shooters Party and the National Party are being duchessed for their votes with these, respectively:

1. Increased access, says ABC radio this morning to most State Forests. Similar to this 9 May Game on: forest ferals are hunters' targets - Local News - News ... Hard to get any record online and the minister Ian Maconald is taking our call on notice. Seems they are checking with their Game Council, a NSW Govt initiative. Nothing in their list of media releases. ABC news confirm its sourced to Brian Boyle, the Game Council executive officer. Such a provenance suggests high politics at ministerial level. The Game Council's David Dixon explains 192 state forests were advertised in early March and finalised in the Government Gazette on Friday 7th May 2008. Now the Game Council are administratively rolling out access to sporting shooters. The trouble is these folks are not scientific or expert clinical marksmen and unlikely to make any dent in feral populations even with truck loads of carcasses. It's bad policy.

 2. 21 May 2008 Don't sell off stock routes, Iemma urged - ABC News

This is an affront to public safety and conservation concerns. But nothing matters to Iemma and the spiv ALP except that $15 billion Opera House sized pot of money.

Posted by editor at 10:32 AM NZT

Updated: Wednesday, 21 May 2008 12:01 PM NZT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  sad

It's not our struggle (or maybe it is ecology wise?), but self described 'righteous gentile' here has noticed an inconvenient truth from our 6 years doing hack for crusty anti nuclear group Friends of the Earth Sydney 1995-2001.

That's a group that had (in)direct contact with Mordechai Vanunu via their eccentric anti nukes campaigner John Hallam who was also a friend and supporter of Reverend Ray Richmond of Wayside Chapel in Kings Cross (and notice Jewish local Norman Lee father of Ben Lee in the link there donating to Wayside). Mordechai spent time in the backpacker/tourism/entertainment/foodie/red light district when he visited Sydney briefly:

The Sydney connection

While working at the nuclear plant, Mordechai Vanunu became troubled by the implications of his work.  Despite signing security agreements, he took photos of the Dimona plant. He took these with him on his travels.

Visiting Sydney in mid-1986, Mordechai Vanunu joined a discussion group at St John's Anglican Church, Darlinghurst.  While in Sydney he made two momentous decisions.  One was to become a Christian (a major step for someone from an Orthodox Jewish family). The second was to make his photographs public in order to warn the world about Israel's nuclear capacity and the spread of nuclear weapons.

There has been a corner of every ngo heart for the anti nuke/peace activist whistleblower ever since. God/Yaweh bless him.

So anyway .... we greatly sympathisise with the view Israel has become a covert aparthied state, increasingly in the South African pariah sense, with haughty assertions it has earned the right to be so. This is morally wrong as most thinking people understand and a festering sore on the body geo politik.

It tempts fate both in terms of demographic frictions within and close to their own 'borders' and tests western allies like the USA with it's own racial baggage and lessons of such as ML King. It tests Australia who repudiated South Africa under the ultra right, Nazi sympathising SA Govt (how ironic is that, refer Mandela's Long Walk to Freedom) up 1990.

This all suggests a one state solution over time with commonsense and mediation over time and good faith on both sides. Except for one thing. And it's quite probably a game breaker on the one state solution which should worry the whole wide world.

Because it involves an irresistable force of growing Arabic population demographic to immovable object of 100-200 nuclear arsenal that Israel wisely keeps highly discreet (referenced below). And everyone knows how humans have trouble with these situations ending in war, only it could be a war to finish all of us.  

Who really believes short of disarmament treaties with Iran etc and iron clad confidence of USA backers, and a reconstructed Israel polity itself, let alone Hezbollah, Hamas etc, an ethnically diverse country and govt will be trusted with that nuke weaponry? And even those pre conditions won't be enough probably.

It's a big ask. Not inconceivable but just about. This is why we tend to conclude there will always be a two state agenda preserving 'Israel' as we know it for as long as there is always a planet to locate same. And it's with a heavy heart too given the aparthied implications and intractable grievance.

One thing is for sure, not recognising this impasse and not talking about it won't do either. There might be people smarter than we, an Einstien of diplomacy, and not just nuclear physics, out there to help?

We were put in mind of this dismal impasse recently resolving this clumsy censorship (?) or perhaps misunderstanding at centre left New Matilda, keeping similar view off this string. We can be grateful for the line of inquiry, 2nd story here on SAM albeit grim: We came across this referencing to the profound Federation of American Scientists (below) which corroborates exactly this analysis of covert nuke weaponry of USS 'Aircraft Carrier Israel' :

       Excerpt from 160-page secret DIA report, first disclosed and reproduced in Rowan Scarborough, Rumsfeld's War (Regnery, 2004), pp. 194-223.

Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:11 PM

Subject: still waiting .... Israel nuke arsenal, Federation of American Scientists

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/

"Israel could potentially have produced a few dozen nuclear warheads in the period 1970-1980, and is thought to have produced sufficient fissile material to build 100 to 200 warheads by the mid-1990s. In 1986 descriptions and photographs of Israeli nuclear warheads were published in the London Sunday Times of a purported underground bomb factory at the Dimona nuclear reactor. The photographs were taken by Mordechai Vanunu, a dismissed Israeli nuclear technician. His information led some experts to conclude that Israel had a stockpile of 100 to 200 nuclear devices at that time.

By the late 1990s the U.S. Intelligence Community estimated that Israel possessed between 75-130 weapons, based on production estimates. The stockpile would certainly include warheads for mobile Jericho-1 and Jericho-2 missiles, as well as bombs for Israeli aircraft, and may include other tactical nuclear weapons of various types. Some published estimates even claimed that Israel might have as many as 400 nuclear weapons by the late 1990s. We believe these numbers are exaggerated, and that Israel's nuclear weapons inventory may include less than 100 nuclear weapons. Stockpiled plutonium could be used to build additional weapons if so decided."

....................................

http://www.fas.org/about/index.html

"The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) was founded in 1945 by scientists who had worked on the Manhattan Project to develop the first atomic bombs. These scientists recognized that science had become central to many key public policy questions. They believed that scientists had a unique responsibility to both warn the public and policy leaders of potential dangers from scientific and technical advances and to show how good policy could increase the benefits of new scientific knowledge."

Posted by editor at 8:50 AM NZT

Updated: Wednesday, 21 May 2008 2:33 PM NZT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  incredulous

We got our 2nd free ticket to the Sydney Writers Festival today in a radio competition but we still haven't managed to go. At the tail end of the ABC TV prime time news tonight we noticed a related report about a book on sexism embarrassing various public figures. It's a book by Meredith Burgmann and Yvette Andrews at the Sydney Writer's Festival called The Ernies Book

It's a well practised schtik by these two and it looks like the men of Australia continue to feed them up lots of material.

Just as these two serve up moral skeletons of their own. How ironic.

In Burgmann's case it's the airbrushing of perhaps a million North Korean women who died  (that is 50% of 2 million dead) in that govt created famine in the late 90ies . Airbrushed in this sanitised piece by Burgmann 

Piccolo Diplomacy | newmatilda.com

Not surprisingly Burgmann was not preselected to run for the ALP against Clover Moore MP  who holds the position of mayor of the City of Sydney, and it might be noted a strong Catholic.

The ALP Premier Morris Iemma is similarly a church goer. Maybe the ALP hierarchy could see some PR problems for Burgmann over the location of 2 million famine deaths as her last holiday choice with not a hint of unease. And they would be right about that with SAM here just being an entre to her predicted election demise. And here is another serve over her parliamentary votes for ALP trashing of the environment. [Declaration: We did electioneer for Clover Moore in 2004.]

In Yvette Andrews case it has been a dubious involvement in sanitising an irregular (and we say as a solicitor improper) rent free gallery lease provided to her mate as a private art for sale business on public land at Addison Rd Community Centre in Marrickville. 4 years rent free in fact with no financial records to the centre management as we hear it, for at least 2 years while Andrews had a junior and then senior central role on the ARC Board. It's a bit more complex than that but not much more.

Andrews stands accused of sanitising this bogus rent free 500sq metres at the ARC, first as President of ARC Board from her honorary appointment, and then General Manager in a job handed to her by her own (stacked?) Board. This GM job has never been advertised to the public this last 8 months and counting. We've been keeping tabs on this state of affairs a while now:

And here more recently. And here. Andrews is going down on this issue of abuse of public resources as night follows day.

None of this excuses male chauvinist pigs. But the idea these two authors are paragons or even guardians of public morality is frankly a joke, indeed an insult to those who are paragons on issues of gender equity and political integrity. If they are good writers then that's all it is.

In our view these are not two morally superior beings to be sermonising to others. No doubt their book is very popular to establishment sisterhood with undoubted greivances. Only we think the sisterhood might look for some more worthy moral champions within their midst.

Posted by editor at 9:30 PM NZT

Updated: Tuesday, 20 May 2008 10:44 PM NZT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  incredulous

 

Postscript 4 November 2008 - A few months later and the actual constructions on the campus indicate that the impressions of the story below were misconceived. The new Law School building is not blocking the sandstone view but rather is some 300 metres away to the south east. However at the time of writing back on 20 May 2008 the clear impression by the official construction signboard for the new Law School building in the foreground of bulldozers on the lawns in front of the sandstone suggested something alot more radical. What these machines were doing it appears months later was replacing grass with paving stones walkway. That is no impact on the aesthetics or view at least subject to loss of little grass to cope with hoards of pedestrian students. Overall we can say what a relief.

 

 

 

 

 

Pictures above and following give an idea of some startling developments on Sydney Uni campus.

The first is a shocker - fully 1/3 of the view of the majestic heritage sandstone quadrangle building 'announced' by the open space front lawns visible all the way from Victoria Park is being obscured with some God ugly modern Law School building. Progress? We wonder. It's one of Sydney's best views reminiscent of Castle Howard in Brideshead Revisited.

Certainly lost open green space. We can't imagine what such doyens of heritage as Elizabeth Farrelly or others there at the urban affairs 'pod' at the Sydney Mornding Herald might think of it.

The other development is more uplifting as below - reclaimed road surface transformed into open space safe pedestrian boulevarde from City Rd into the campus, as well as extended pedestrian overpass. In a sense one can see the planner's logical tradeoff - road surface for building footprint on the lawns. Very pragmatic too. But it's a big impact on aesthetics. You be the judge. Some of the alumni will not be amused.

Posted by editor at 4:11 PM NZT

Updated: Tuesday, 4 November 2008 8:22 AM EADT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  sharp

Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 3:14 PM

Subject: fels profile build Re: [chipstop] Letter in response to Fels, Brenchley NAFI propaganda

I think this article of mine a week back might be relevant to Fels postures on anything vaguely pro industry at the moment from easier approval of shopping centres (see World Today show 19 May 08), to sloppy analysis of logging industry on greenhouse as per Harriet here, or as here big banks:

Tuesday, 13 May 2008

Prof Allan Fels profile build to stalk Graeme Samuel's ACCC job?
Mood:  d'oh
Topic: aust govt

and then there is this pretty overt attack on firstly Howard ex regime but also Graeme Samuels here, again with AFR ex editor

So much for reining in big business | businessday.com.au 

Allan Fels and Fred Brenchley; May 3, 2008 ... Even the chairman of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, Graeme Samuel, appears at sixes and

Yep, Allan Fels is making himself a real pain in the butt all over the place but probably insinuating himself very effectively with the Rudd machine?

This was the latest source of aggravation about loud mouth Allan Fels and his mate former editor of the AFR Brenchley:

Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:51 PM

Subject: [chipstop] Letter in response to Fels, Brenchley NAFI propaganda

Hi greenies
Letter in response to Fels, Brenchley NAFI propaganda

Letter to the Editor
So, the forestry industry is “greening up its act.” (SMH 17-18/5:45,47). If we read between the lines of the National Association of Forest Industries(NAFI)’s latest piece of self serving propaganda repackaged as “climate friendly,” we see they want to continue woodchipping our forests and count them as carbon sinks, too.
Under the Kyoto protocol, of course, they can. Kyoto doesn’t distinguish between a 500 year old forest and a six month old regrowth.
But NAFI doesn’t just want business as usual; it also wants a pulpmill and is asking the Government to redefine its old dream of burning native forests for fuel as “clean and renewable.”
If it seriously thinks this will “end Australia’s emotional debate over logging and even woodchipping” it is mistaken.
Harriett Swift

 

 

Have a read of this business horror story here (and yes we do mean you Prof Fels, Brenchley):

Some policy rhetoric in a response to the lines in the Fels/Brenchley article.

 

- The 1992 National Forest Policy Statement was a set of weasel words used to summarise the excellent Commonwealth Resource Assessment Commission 1992 Forest and Timber Inquiry Final Report of March 1992. The RAC was headed by Justice Don Stewart formerly of the National Crime Commission appointed by Bob Hawke. His chief of research was one Clive Hamilton. Keating as new PM had no love of Hawke creations and RAC was soon disbanded.

 

- The findings of RAC included, to paraphrase 'that no example of ecologically sustainable native forest logging was identified anywhere in Australia'. This was not for lack of searching. They do not exist because logging is highly mechanised, destroying canopy, dominated by high intensity woodchipping to transform the public land into pseudo plantation for private profit. All aided and abetted by corrupt accounting within state forest agencies.

 

- The bipartisan NSW Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee of 1990 found for instance that profits from plantations were being channeled into the loss making native forest sector at considerable lost public revenue and lost public heritage. The PAC recommended the NSW Forestry Commission be split into two parts to prevent this covert cross subsidy. In NSW the agency was simply rebranded as 'State Forests'.

 

- The so called Regional Forestry 'Agreements' of the late 90ies involved state to federal govt agreement with industry but never had consent of the public, represented by reputable polling against woodchipping or non government group membership representing some million or more Australians.  In this sense the RFAs are a fraud on the public by special interests in Canberra and highly paid PR operations. 

 

- perhaps the worst ongoing impact of this high intensity logging from a general public perspective is that huge swathes of landscape have been dried out due to disruption of humidity preserving canopy in natural forest. This is a recipe for megafire upon ignition. A megafire scenario aided and abetted by intensified woodchip driven logging.

- The emerging profitable plantation estate was evident as early as 1990-91 and was already underway well before the official tax incentivised 'forestry managed investment schemes'. The greater agri efficiency of plantation timber was out-competing hunter gatherer native forest logging as per published economic analysis of Judy Clark (later known as Judith Adjani) at that time. Out competing and replacing native forest logging. By 2000 it was clear that, in both volume of timber and jobs, plantations completely dominate the sector making the native forest sector look a niche cottage sector - apart from massive clearing via woodchipping to annexe public land. For instance a story "CSR, Boral form vehicle for sawmill operations" By Damon Kitney  in the Australian Financial Review, p27 17th February 2000, indicates:

• the massive 550,000 m3/yr plantation sawlog industry around Oberon based on the existing plantation stockpile - dwarfing for instance the highly controversial native forest volume of 42,000m3/yr allocated on the NSW south coast, or 48,000 m3/yr at Tumbarumba/Tumut region;

 

- The MIS tax breaks accelerated the plantation domination, but also the traditional industry desire to clear and annexe as much public forest estate for higher efficiency plantation, as rent seekers of free land rather than establishment on existing cleared land. This has been a grotesque market distortion and public subsidy exploiting our water catchments and natural carbon store to lazy but politically powerful special corporate interests always interested in more free land of sufficiently high rainfall profile. The greed of private interests at the expense of the public estate in this respect is grotesque. For Fels to lend his weight to this agenda is a betrayal of his own principles.

 

- For Prof Fels to endorse the NFPS of  late 1992 as good competition policy is an insult to the RAC report earlier in 1992. Indeed Clive Hamilton spoke at a public rally in the Domain in Sydney around 1994 about the attack on our sovereign democracy by narrow corporate interests trying to annexe public forest for private profit. And he was right. Fels and Brenchley completely misconceive the internal federal ALP Parliamentary politics of 1991-96 in the transition to the Keating years when anything Hawke pioneered was trashed. Or indeed the role of industry front group 'Forest Protection Society' funded by NAFI (not dis similar to Westfield's bogus 'community groups against rival shopping centre developers) that supported woodchipping of Old Growth mature public forest. The FPA was forced under threats of legal complaints under section 52 of the Trade Practices Act and/or rhetorical expose to change their name, which they did to Timber Communities Australia - that still supports woodchipping of old growth forest today.

 

 - In short nothing NAFI submits in terms of natural forests in the public estate can be trusted and this pretty much reaches all the way back to the RAC report of 1992 and Keating's weasel words interpretation in the NFPS. In 1996 both the Australian Conservation Foundation and The Wilderness Society took the extraordinary step of repudiating the ALP under Keating and remaining neutral in the federal election of that year, not least for wanton public forest destruction, which allowed the Howard led Opposition to portray themselves as at least competitive on the environment.

 

This was true in the sense that both major parties were in a race to the bottom as seen most starkly in the corruption of landuse and govt process in Tasmania today over the Gunns Pulp Mill.

Prof Fels must recant to protect his own professional reputation.

Tom McLoughlin, Bsc/Llb hon

More context about those times relating to then Industry Minister John Button here:

Wednesday, 9 April 2008

John Button's spirit at the 2020 Summit regarding forests: 'Woodchipping's a bastard of an industry'
Mood:  crushed out
Topic: aust govt

Posted by editor at 10:56 PM NZT

Updated: Tuesday, 20 May 2008 8:48 PM NZT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink