Mood:
chattyTopic: legal
Last Friday we submitted 97 paragraphs of honed, refined argument only exceeded by our grasp of the policy, legal nuance and contradictions of the whole sorry affair of over allocation of water licences at Peats Ridge, Mangrove Mountain. Well maybe. We wish as agent for intervenor Diamond.
The full text of the pro bono submissions document filed and served yesterday 25 July 2008 (in preparation for the callover on Tuesday morning 29th July 2008 at the Land & Environment Court of NSW) can be found here:
25 July 2008 Outline of submissions on Coca Cola legal appeal to delete 66ML/YR Trial at Peats Ridge
Previous postings on this topic can be found here:
- Friday, 25 July 2008
- Friday, 18 July 2008
- Friday 18 July 2008 - Is this how Coca Cola pick and choose their expert evidence to destroy Peats Ridge Springs?
Mood:
blue
Topic: legal - Tuesday, 15 July 2008
- Saturday, 5 July 2008Coca Cola water bottling Case, Peats Ridge Springs: Objector gets a chance to be heard
Mood: chatty
Topic: legal - Friday, 4 July 2008
- 4 July 2008 - Coca Cola Amatil caught out breaching bulk export condition in trial at Peats Ridge Springs?
Mood:
sharp - Friday, 27 June 2008Coca Cola water bottling case: Draft short order of minutes for court consideration today
Mood: chatty
Topic: legal - Friday, 27 June 2008Coca Cola water bottling case: Community Objector submissions to Justice Pain today 3 pm
Mood: chatty
Topic: legal - Tuesday 24 June 2008 - Does Coca Cola bottled water at Peats Ridge have a chook poo contamination problem in the future?
Mood:
not sure
Topic: health - Friday, 13 June 2008Environmental agitator seeks to join legal action against Coca Cola at Peats Ridge Springs, NSW
Mood:
a-ok
Topic: nsw govt
Posted by editor
at 7:45 PM NZT
Updated: Saturday, 26 July 2008 8:38 PM NZT
